Sabita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30434 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-863 Year-2011 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SABITA DEVI Wife of Jogendra Sharma, Resident of Village - Dhobri, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jahanabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR 2.

Asha Devi Wife of Purushottam Sharma, Resident of Village - Dhobri, P.S.- Ghoshi, District- Jahanabad, Presently residing At - C/o - Late Utanand Sharma, Village - Nonhi, P.S.- Kako, District- Jehanabad. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Brijnandan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 863 of 2011, Tr. No. 725 of 2018 registered for offence punishable under sections 323, 307 and 377 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 26.09.2015 in A.B.P. No.1021/2015, but she failed to furnish the bail bond within a period of four weeks and on that account, the order became infructuous.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30434 of 2019(2) dt.08-05-2019 2/2 the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge-I, Jehanabad in connection with Complaint Case No. 863 of 2011, Tr. No. 725 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) mkchy/- U T