Patna High CourtCWJC/13692/2015disposed

Usha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-04Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13692 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Usha Kumari W/o Vinkatesh Kumar Pathak, Residentof Mohalla - Godna Road Co-operative Colony, Ara, Post - Aniath, P.S. - Nawaa, District - Bhojpur at Ara at present posted as Principal Teacher, Primary School, Mirganj, P.S. - Barhara, District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Human Resources development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Reginal Deputy Director of Education, Patna Division, Patna.

5. The District Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara.

6. The District Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara.

7. The District Programme Officer, Establishment, Bhojpur at Ara.

8. The Block Education Officer, Bhojpur at Ara.

9. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Babhangawan, Prakhand - Barhara, District - Bhojpura at Ara.

10. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Bhabhugawan, Prakhand - Barhara, District - Bhojpur at Ara.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar No.1 For the Respondent State: Mr. P N Sharma, AC to AG For Respondent No.9 : Mr. Arun Kumar =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-12-2015 Writ application is disposed of now in view of the issuance of the order of re-joining of the petitioner. The Court is informed that her joining is being facilitated today.

In view of the same, the personal appearance of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat

Patna High Court CWJC No.13692 of 2015 dt.04-12-2015 as well as the Panchayat Secretary now stands dispensed with. However, the Court makes it clear that if any impediment is created in the joining and functioning of the petitioner, the Court may take serious view of the matter.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U