← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/995/2014dfd for non appearance

Binod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-28The Chief Justice1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.995 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15874 of 2011 ====================================================== Binod Kumar, son of Sri Krishna Deo Singh, resident of B 30 Anand Vihar Colony, P.O.- Bihar Veterinary College, P.S.-Rupaspur, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Ashok Vardhan the Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri Md. Suhail, son of not known to the petitioner, the Collector, District Magistrate, Jehanabad.

3. Shri Dhurath Sayaliu Sabala Ram, D/o not known to the petitioner, the Supreintendent of Police, Jehanabad.

4. Sri Prakash Singh, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Circle Officer, Jehanabad.

5. Sri Kuber Chandra Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Jehanabad.

6. Manoj Kumar, son of not known to the petitioner, the officer in charge, Jehanabad Police Station.

7. Mukesh Kumar, son of Late Uma Kant Singh.

8. Nitesh Kumar, son of late Uma Kant Singh.

9. Rajesh Kumar @ Manoj Kumar, son of late Uma Kant Singh.

10. Amardeep Kumar, son of late Uma Kant Singh

11. Dhiraj Kumar, son of late Uma Kant Singh

12. Seo Kumari Devi Sl. No. 7 to 12 are resident of village-Daudipur, P.O.-Kalpa, P.S.- Jehanabad, District-Jehanabad.

13. Neetu Kumari, wife of Dharmendra Kumar, resident of villageAinwan, P.S. and District-Jehanabad. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Singh, AC to SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 None appears for the petitioner. Sri Pramod Kumar Singh, learned AC to SC-16 appears for the respondents-State. As none is appearing for the petitioner, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Sunil/- U