← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45179/2018bail granted

Sanju Devi @ Parvati Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-08Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45179 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -290 Year- 2017 Thana -AMARPUR District- BANKA ======================================================

1. Sanju Devi @ Parvati Devi, aged about 50 years, Wife of Manoj Sah

2. Phulo Devi, aged about 22 years, W/o Kaval Sah. Both resident of Village- Kumarkhal, Police Station- Amarpur, DistrictBanka. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajib Ranjan Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Amarpur P.S. Case No. 290 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are ladies. There is no allegation of any specific overt act or assault against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45179 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 290 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.

U T