Md. Mustafa Kamal v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11020 of 2014 ====================================================== Md. Mustafa Kamal S/o Md. Israfil Ansari Resident of Village Rampur, Police Station Nawa Nagar, District Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Primary Education & Sarv Siksha Abhiyan, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Buxar, District Buxar.

5. The District Education Officer (Sarv Siksha Abhiyan), District Buxar.

6. The District Programme Officer, Primary Education and Serva Siksha Abhiyan, Buxar, District Buxar.

7. The Block Education Extension Officer, Prakhand Sansadhan Kendra Block Kesath, District Buxar.

8. The Secretary, Urdu Primary School, Rampur, District Buxar.

9. The Headmaster, Urdu Primary School, Rampur, District Buxar.

10. Hidaytulla, Assistant Teacher & the then Secretary, Urdu Primary School, Rampur, District Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bidhan Chandra Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. S.A. Alam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has discharged his responsibility as teacher ( Shikha Swayam Sevak) Talimi Markaz but he was not paid honorarium since February 2010. In the matter of payment of honorarium for discharging responsibility by the petitioner, the respondent authority has to verify the record and if it is found that the

Patna High Court CWJC No.11020 of 2014(3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 petitioner has actually worked for the aforesaid period and his honorarium has to be paid. In view of the above the writ petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent District Programme Officer (Saksharata) to verify the record and if the petitioner has actually discharged the responsibility of Talimi Markaz he shall ensure that honorarium be paid to the petitioner within a maximum period of 60 days from the receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

3. Respondent is also required to verify whether anything is payable to the petitioner as contingency fund or not and if it is found something is payable under contingency fund then he shall also ensure the payment of contingency fund within time framed.

4. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) banti/-T.Kr.

U