Ganesh Prasad Gupta v. The State Of Bihar Through Anjani Kumar Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3593 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18031 of 2009 ====================================================== Ganesh Prasad Gupta Son of Late Hira Lal Gupta Resident of Village - Fulkaha Bazar, P.S.-Fulkaha Narpatganj, District - Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar Through Anjani Kumar Chief Secretary Government Of Bihar and Ors 2.

Sri Aamir Subhani, the Secretary Home Spl. Department Government of Bihar Patna.

3.

Sri Sudhir Karika, the Superintendent of Police Araria. 4.

Sri Om Prakash Yadav, thana Incharge Fulkaha Narpatganj Police Station and District - Araria.

5.

Shyam Kishore Yadav, Formal SHO Fulkaha thana Narpatganj Araria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Bhagat, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Mankeshwar Jiwan, AC to AAG- 3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 24-07-2023 The petitioner is to remove the defect(s) within two weeks.

The present petition has been preferred for compliance of order dated 18.01.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 18031 of 2009.

A perusal of Annexure 2 shows that the petitioner had earlier moved this Court in MJC No. 4294 of 2012 which was disposed of on 12.03.2014 by a bench of this Court (Hon'ble Mr. Justice Navin Sinha, as his lordships then was) and in the concluding para, it has been stated as follows:- In the facts and circumstances of the case, the ownership of the lands of the erstwhile Police Station

Patna High Court MJC No.3593 of 2016(5) dt.24-07-2023 2/2 being in more than person, the two owners in dispute amongst themselves, pendency of case No.

253 of 2013 before the Commissioner, Purnia, the acknowledgement by the petitioner that his share of the lands had been subsequently vacated, the institution of a departmental proceeding against the S.H.O., leaves the Court satisfied that no further orders are required in the contempt proceedings.

The proceedings are disposed.

Despite the said order, once again the present contempt petition.

The same is accordingly dismissed.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/VikashU