Patna High CourtCWJC/20670/2013disposed

Hanuman Sahu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-20Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.20670 of 2013 (2) dt.20-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20670 of 2013 ====================================================== Hanuman Sahu, Son Of Late Lutan Sahu, Resident of Village - Lohana West Police Station - Bhairab Asthan, Prakhand - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate, Madhubani

3. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Jhanjharpur, Police Station - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani

4. The Anchal Adhikari, Jhanjharpur, Police Station - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani

5. The Officer - In - Charge, Bhairab Asthan, Police Station - District - Madhubani

6. Jawahar Yadav Son of Late Kapleshwar Yadav Resident Of Village - Lohana West Police Station - Bhairab Asthan Prakhand - Jhanjharpur, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Prasad, Adv. Mr. Prabhas Ranjan, Adv.

For the State : Mr. Chittaranjan Sinha, PAAG-2 Mr. Shailendra Kumar, AC to PAAG-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to PAAG-2 for the State.

The present writ application has been filed for a direction to respondent authorities to get the encroachment removed made by respondent no.6 on a public road pertaining to Plot No.2035, situated in the Village- Lohana (West) Police station-Bhairab Asthan in the District of Madhubani. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

Patna High Court CWJC No.20670 of 2013 (2) dt.20-06-2017 to withdraw this application in view of the specific averment made in paragraph no. 14 of the counter affidavit, filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 on 20.06.2017, to the effect that the encroachment has been removed from the land in question. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Ashwini/- U