Jagarnath Sharma @ Jagannath Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46441 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -79 Year- 2018 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. JAGARNATH SHARMA @ JAGANNATH SHARMA, S/o Late Bhajju Sharma, Resident of Bhori, Tekari, Police Station- Tekari, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nivedita Nirvikar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 125 (B) (i) (3) Bihar Panchayat Act,2006. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has not disclosed the detail of criminal cases, pending against the petitioner before filing the nomination paper. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the allegations leveled against the petitioner is baseless and the petitioner has given details about the cases, which will appear from Annexures- 2,5 and 7 showing the details of cases, pending
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46441 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018 2/2 against him in which he has acquitted. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Gaya, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T