Pramila Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46384 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Pramila Devi, W/o Ram Naresh Sahni,
2. Radhika Devi W/o Krishna Sahni, Both Residents of Vill.- Hussepur Jorakanhi, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramchandra Sahani, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 316, 323, 324, 341, 380, 354, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners, who happens to the lady members is of order giver and they are named in the F.I.R.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no allegation of assault against the petitioners and the petitioners are Gotia of the informant and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is land dispute between the parties and the petitioners have no criminal
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46384 of 2018 (2) dt.10-08-2018 2/2 antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- Cum- Sub Judge 1st, West Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 100 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/-sunil U T