Vijay Sharma And ANR v. State Of Bihar And ANR
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5319 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2017 Thana- JEHANABAD COMPLAINT CASE District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.
Vijay Sharma 2.
Arun Sharma, Both Sons of Late Rajeshwar Sharma, Resident of VillageTejpura, P.S.-Rampur, Chauram, District-Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
State Of Bihar 2.
Rajendra Singh, Son of Late Jagdish Singh, Resident of Village-Tejpura, P.S.-Rampur, Chauram, District-Arwal.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise all issues at the time of framing of charge, if charges, till date, have not been framed.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T