Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45142/2018allowed

Sanjay Rai v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-01Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar,Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45142 of 2018 In Criminal Appeal (DB) No.1232 of 2017 ====================================================== Sanjay Rai son of Late Haridwar Rai, resident of Village- Barasima, P.S. Alipur, District- Gaya (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Radhe Rai @ Radheshyam Rai son of Late Rajdeo Rai.

3. Ram Sevak Rai son of Radhe Rai @ Radhe Shyam Rai.

4. Ramashish Rai son of Late Rajdeo Rai.

5. Sitaram Rai son of Late Tribhuji Rai.

6. Munna Rai son of Sitaram Rai.

7. Chunna Rai son of Sitaram Rai.

8. Mukesh Rai son of Deep Narayan Rai.

9. Jhunna Rai son of Sitaram Rai.

10. Chintu Rai son of Ramashish Rai.

11. Pintu Rai son of Ramashish Rai.

12. Ramakant Rai son of Late Tribhuji Rai.

13. Bikesh Rai son of Deep Narayan Rai.

14. Rinku Rai son of Gopal Rai.

15. Gopal Rai son of Late Arjun Rai.

16. Sadhu Rai son of Vinay Rai.

17. Karu Rai son of Vinay Rai.

All resident of Village- Barasima, P.S.- Alipur, District- Gaya (Bihar). ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR) 01-08-2018 Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner and learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. The present petition has been filed with a prayer to restore Cr.Appeal (DB) No.1232 of 2017, which stood dismissed due to non-compliance of the peremptory order dated

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45142 of 2018(2) dt.01-08-2018 2/2 05.01.2018.

Learned counsel for the appellant/petitioner, by way of referring to the statement made in paragraph nos.4 and 5 of the present petition, submits that the order dated 05.01.2018 passed in Cr.Appeal (DB) No.1232 of 2017 has already been complied with. However, some delay has occurred, which has been explained in the present petition.

Accordingly, the petition is allowed and Cr.Appeal (DB) No.1232 of 2017 is directed to be restored to its original file.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) ( Arvind Srivastava, J.) nawalkrs/- U T