Urmila Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45242 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -177 Year- 2018 Thana -KUDHNI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Urmila Devi, W/o Shivji Rai
2. Manju Devi, W/o Birendra Rai
3. Sarita Devi, W/o Jitendra Rai, All residents of village - Bakarpur, P.S. - Kudhni (Turki O.P.), District - Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Kudhni P.S. Case No.177 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner No.1 is mother-in-law and petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are Gotnis of the deceased. They have no concern with the family affairs of husband of the deceased. It is alleged that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45242 of 2018 (2) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No.177 of 2018, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, West, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T