Om Prakash v. Abhay Chandra Mishra And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1085 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21003 of 2012 ====================================================== Om Prakash son of Late Jagram Prasad resident of village Nawanagar, P.S. Nawanagar, District Buxar at present posted as Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sasaram.

.... .... Appellant

Versus

1. Abhay Chandra Mishra Son of Anand Mishra Resident of Mo. - Patan Gali Po. - Sasaram, Ps. - Sasaram (Town) District Rohtas At present Readymade Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

2. Kapil Singh @ Kapil Deo Singh Son of Banshropan Singh Resident of Village - Dhanpurwa, Po and Ps - Sasaram District - Rohtas at present Readymade Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

3. Krishna Singh Son of Laxman Singh Resident of Village - Dhuwan, Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas, At present Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

4. Surendra Sah S/o Late Neema Sah Resident of Mo. Company Sarai, Sasaram (Rohtas) At present Cloth Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

5. Sunil Prasad @ Sunil Kumar S/o Chhote Lal Prasad Resident of Mo. - Madarasa Road, Sasaram, At present Hardware Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

6. Mahendra Sah Son of Mohan Sah Resident of Mo. - Company Sarai, Sasaram District - Rohtas At present Readymade Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

7. Mohan Prasad Son of Late Neema Sah Resident of Mo. - Company Sarai, Sasaram District - Rohtas At present Cloth Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

8. Banarsi Prasad Son of Late Vishwanath Prasad Resident of Mo. - Kabir Ganj, Sasaram, District - Rohtas At present Resident of Mo. - Kabir Ganj, Sasaram District - Rohtas At present Cloth Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai , Sasaram, Rohtas.

9. Radheshyam Sah @ Radhe Shyam Pd. Son of Neema Sah Resident of Mo. - Company Sarai, Sasaram District - Rohtas At present Cloth Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

10. Shankar Prasad Sahu alias Shiv Shankar Sah Son of Ram Prasad Sahu Resident of Village - Karpurwa, Ps - Sasaram District Rohtas at present Cloth Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

11. Suresh Singh Son of Dukhi Mahto Resident of Mo. - Company Sarai, Sasaram District - Rohtas, At present Churi Shop, Meena Bazar Company Sarai, Sasaram, Rohtas.

12. The State of Bihar.

13. The Principal Secretary, Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

14. The Director, Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

15. The Divisional Commissionar, Patna Division, Patna.

16. The Collector cum District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

17. The Additional Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram.

18. Circle Officer, Sasaram Block, Rohtas at Sasaram.

19. Jaganarayan Singh Son of Late Ram Janam Singh Resident of Mo. -

Patna High Court LPA No.1085 of 2014 (10) dt.17-07-2017 2/2 Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

20. Smt. Savitri Devi Wife of Sri Jagnarayan Singh Resident of Mo. - Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

21. Manoj Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jaganarayan Singh Resident of Mo. - Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

22. Pramod Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jaganarayan Singh Resident of Mo. - Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

23. Sujeet Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jaganarayan Singh Resident of Mo. - Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas.

24. Arun Kumar Singh Son of Sri Jaganarayan Singh Resident of Mo. - Khilanganj, Po and Ps - Sasaram, District - Rohtas. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Parth Sarthi (Ga11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) 17-07-2017 This appeal stands disposed of now in view of the changed circumstances since an order of punishment has been passed against the appellant. Let him now assail that order before the forum the appellant chooses.

It is made clear that the order of punishment has been brought on record by way of an affidavit filed on behalf of the State and duly served on the counsel for the appellant. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Pawan/- U