Ajeet Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45264 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHAJITPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Ajeet Singh, son of late Madan Singh, resident of village- Pipara, P.S. Sahajitpur, District- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sahajitpur P.S. Case No.04 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 332, 333, 353, 427 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he gave order to assault the police party and thereafter co-accused Satish Singh and Munna Thakur caught hold SAF Jawan Abdul Sattar and 8-10 unknown persons assaulted him and also snatched his rifle. In such circumstances, there is no allegation against the petitioner of committing any assault.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45264 of 2018 (2) dt.09-08-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No.04 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Saran at Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.

U T