Shailendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55590 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2017 Thana -AGAMKUAN District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Shailendra Prasad S/o Kishori Prasad, R/o Village- Akaid, P.S.- Nagar Nausa, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mira Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 96 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is Mausa of husband of the deceased. In the written report itself, it is mentioned that the deceased was living with her husband near the house of this petitioner. As such, the deceased was living with her husband and this petitioner has no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55590 of 2017 (2) dt.23-11-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Agamkuan P.S. Case No. 96 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial MagistrateIst, Patna City, Patna subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T