Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31020 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2022 Thana- SHANKARPUR District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1.

PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ SAH SON OF LATE SHIVAN SAH Resident of Village- Jirva, Ward No.02, Police Station-Shankarpur, DistrictMadhepura 2.

ANKAJ KUMAR SON OF LATE SHIVAN SAH Resident of VillageJirva,Ward No.02, Police Station-Shankarpur, District-Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354(A), 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to land, petitioners along with Neeraj assaulted her son by farsa and iron rod and other accused assaulted her family members, further alleges that Pushpam snatched Rs. 9,000/- from her son's pocket and assaulted by lathi.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31020 of 2023(2) dt.28-07-2023 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that though it is alleged that petitioners along with Neeraj assaulted her son with farsa and iron rod but then the injuries suffered by the injured is simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application, it is next submitted that this amply demonstrates that petitioner never had any intention of committing any serious occurrence nor the blow was repeated.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Shankarpur P.S. Case No. 125 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T