Kaju Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45212 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2018 Thana -KARAKAT District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Kaju Singh, son of Ram Awatar Singh, resident of Village- Karakat (Gorari), P.S.- Karakat, District- Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Karakat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner and informant are Gotias.
The allegation in the written report against the petitioner is that he along with co-accused Ram Awatar Singh assaulted the informant on his head with lathi, on account of which, he fell down.
The injury report of the informant has been enclosed as Annexure-2 series wherein the Doctor has found simple injury on the person of the informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45212 of 2018 (2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Karakat P.S. Case No. 37 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj (Rohtas), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T