Ranjit Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10740 of 2013 ====================================================== Ranjit Kumar Das, Son of Late Doman Prasad Das, resident of VillageKhagra, P. S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. The Principal Secretary Human Resources Development Department Government of Bihar Patna.
3. The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Tribunal Purnea.
4. That District Magistrate Purnea.
5. The District Programme Officer Purnea.
6. The District Education Officer, Purnea.
7. The Block Development Officer, Baisa, Purnea.
8. The Block Education Extension Officer, Baisa, Purnea.
9. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Chandwar, P.S.- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea.
10. The Panchayat Secretary Gram Panchayat Chandwar P.S.- Angarh Hat District- Purnea.
11 Vishnu Prasad Das, Son of Ajay Kumar Das, resident of VillageMajgama, Ps- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea. 12 Manoj Kumar Yadav, Son of Saheb Lal Yadav, resident of VillageMajgama, Ps- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea. 13 Prabhu Kumar Yadav, Son of Sahdeo Prasad Yadav, resident of VillageMajgama, Ps- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea. 14 Md. Khushru Perwez, Son of Abdul Hasib, resident of VillageChandwar Kutti Gola, Ps- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea. 15 Ravi Lal Singh, Son of Shambhu Lal Singh, R/O Chandwar Kutti Gola, Ps- Angarh Hat District- Purnea.
16 Shankar Prasad Karmkar, Son of Raghubir Prasad Karmkar, R/O Majigama, Ps- Angarh Hat, District Purnea.
17 Ubed Alam, Son of Sheikh Farhateelah, resident of Village- Palasi Bari, Ps- Angarh Hat, District- Purnea.
18 Vishal Ghosh, Son of Pariyanath Ghosh, resident of Village- Kanjia, PsAngarh Hat, District- Purnea. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Samir Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Nandan, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
Patna High Court CWJC No.10740 of 2013 (3) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 to withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to prefer an appeal before the State Appellate Authority, challenging the order dated 13.06.2012, contained in Memo No. 400 dated 13.06.2012, passed in Case No. 1065, by the Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Purnea.
Permission is accorded.
The petitioner shall file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days from the date of the order, which shall be disposed of in accordance with law within the statutory period.
With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U