Bipat Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45154 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -157 Year- 2018 Thana -GARAUL District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Bipat Ram, S/o Jhapas Das,

2. Ravi Kumar S/o Bipat Ram, Both are R/o Vill.- Goraul, P.S.- Goraul, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kr. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 157 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 152, 353 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners and several accused persons is that they were installing the statue of Lord Hanuman and when police came there, then people misbehaved with police personnel and pelted stones.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioner no.1 is Amin and petitioner no.2 is his son. It has further submitted that they have been falsely implicated in this case and no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45154 of 2018 (2) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Goraul P.S. Case No. 157 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T