Krishna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36862 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2022 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Krishna Singh Son of Ramadeban Singh Resident of Village- Bhagwandas Mohalla J.P. Chowk, Post- Lalbagh, P.S.- Nagar, Dist.- Darbhanga, Bihar846004 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ritesh Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Darbhanga Nagar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2022, registered under Section 22(b) of the NDPS Act.

3. Allegedly, the petitioner was found indulged in business of selling intoxicant medicines.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in present case due to dirty politics. All the allegations levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36862 of 2024(2) dt.26-07-2024 2/2

5. Learned counsel further submits that earlier the petitioner has moved before this Court for his anticipatory bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 46394 of 2022, which was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 05.12.2022 by this Court with a liberty to surrender before the learned Court below, but the petitioner has not surrendered himself before the learned Court below. It is further submitted that in course of investigation, the police has submitted final form against him. Thereafter, the petitioner has filed the present application with a prayer for his anticipatory bail. Meanwhile, the learned court below took cognizance against the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the parties as well as the fact that the learned Court below has taken cognizance against the petitioner, the prayer for anticipatory bail is dismissed.

8. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T