M/S Shree Shyam Polymer v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 12684 of 2021 ====================================================== M/s Shree Shyam Polymer a Proprietorship firm through its Sole Proprietor, Mr. Shantanu Agrawal, aged about 29 Years (Male), Son of Shri Bharat Agrawal, Resident of Prakash Bhawan, Goshala Road, P.O./ Ramana, P.S. Mithanpur, District Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, 2nd Floor, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna-800015. 3.

Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Through its Managing Director, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800004, Bihar.

4.

The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna-800004, Bihar. 5.

The Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Avinash Shekhar, Advocate For the S t a t e :

Mr Rakesh Ambastha, AC to AAG 7 For the B I A D A :

Mr Prashant Pratap, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 12-05-2022 After some argument, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of this writ petition to avail remedy of appeal before the Appellate Authority against the impugned order dated 18.01.2021 issued by Memo No 116 dated 02.02.2021 by the Executive Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Regional Office, Muzaffarpur.

Patna High Court CWJC No.12684 of 2021(3) dt.12-05-2022 2/2 This writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with the liberty, as sought.

If the petitioner prefers an appeal within four weeks from today with an application seeking condonation of delay, if any, the Appellate Authority shall consider the petitioner's appeal on merits and decide the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of its filing.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U