Patna High CourtMJC/2869/2013disposed

Upendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-04The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2869 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5463 of 2010 =========================================================== Upendra Yadav S/O Late Fatuli Yadav Resident of Village Rasalpur, P.S. Naugachia, District Bhagalpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Sri Sita Ram Singh, its Secretary Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Tilka Manghi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, through Sri Md. Tahir Hussain through its Registrar, District Bhagalpur.

3. Sri Arun Kumar Sinha, Vice Chancellor of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.

4. Sri Md. Tahir Hussain, The Registrar of Tilka Manjhi, Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur.

5. Sri Jay Prakash Singh, The Principal Of G.B. College, Naugachia, Tilka Manjhi, Bhagalpur University, District Bhagalpur.

6. Kausalia Devi, wife of Late Naresh Yadav, aged about 54 years

7. Yogendra Yadav, son of Late Fatuli Yadav, both residing at Village-Rasalpur, P.O. + P.S.-Naugachia, District-Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv For the University : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Adv For the State : Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, Adv =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 04-08-2017 Considering the fact that the only direction issued in the Writ Petition was to decide the representation of the petitioner and from the show cause filed by the respondents, it is clear that the representation of the petitioner has been decided and the amount issued to the petitioner as indicated in para 3 and 4 of the show cause filed, no further action is required to be taken in the matter.

Patna High Court MJC No.2869 of 2013 dt.04-08-2017 2/2 In case the petitioner has any grievance with regard to the manner in which the representation is made and claim decided, petitioner shall have liberty to assail the same, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the application stands disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 08/08/2017 Transmission Date NA