Rajendra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59167 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -195 Year- 2014 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictNAWADA ======================================================

1. Rajendra Chaudhary, S/o Pyare Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Laund, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Section 47(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that 60 litres of liquor along with 400 Kg of Jawa Mahua is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of secret information as per the complaint. The source and genuineness of the secret

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59167 of 2017 (3) dt.18-12-2017 2/2 information has not been disclosed by the prosecution. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 60 litres of liquor along with 400 Kg of Jawa Mahua is recovered from the joint house of the petitioner, where other family members also reside. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

On behalf of the state, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with G.O. Case No. 195/2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.D.J.-II-cum-Special Court, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T