Punit Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16874 of 2015 ====================================================== Punit Kumar Son of Late Ram Sewak Singh, Resident of Village P.OAkhgaon, P.S. Sandesh, District- Bhohpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The Union Of India through the Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi.
2.
The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi, 3.
Inspector General, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Sector, Patna. 4.
Deputy Inspector General Of Police Force, Patna Range Headquarter, Patna. 5.
Deputy General Of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna Range Headquarter, Patna.
6.
Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Group Centre, Muzaffarpur.
7.
Commandant, 11 Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Latehar, Jharkhand.
8.
Commandant, 153 Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Motihari, East Champaran.
9.
Company Commandant D/11, B Battalion, Central Reserve Police Force, Chandwa, Jharkhand.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manish Kumar, Adv.
For the UOI :
Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the adverse remark for the Annual Assessment Year, 2013 i.e. below good which has been communicated to the petitioner vide Letter No. C.II.1/2014-11 dated 18.06.2014 under the signature of the Commandant,
Patna High Court CWJC No.16874 of 2015(2) dt.15-09-2023 2/2 11 Battalion, C.R.P.F., Latehar, Jharkhand and further to quash the rejection of his representation against adverse remarks by the competent authority which has been communicated vide Message No. C II. 1/15-11-ST dated 11.05.2015 and further for issuance of a consequent writ in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent authorities to grant consequential benefits resulting from quashing of the above said orders and/or for issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions as which seem just and equitable in the facts and circumstances stated hereunder."
2.
At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner simply seeks a direction upon the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna Range, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna, Bihar, to consider the recommendation made by the office of the Commandant, 11 Battalion, C.R.P.F. Latehar, Jharkhand, dated 20.8.2015, contained in Annexure-9 to the present writ petition. It is directed accordingly.
3.
The present writ petition stands disposed off. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U