← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10966/2013dismissed

Smita Sharma v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-10-03Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10966 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Smita Sharma Wife Of Awadhesh Kumar Sharma Resident Of Village Morwa, P.S. Musarigharari, District Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Union of India through Secretary, Department Of Petroleum, Government of India, New Delhi

2. Indian Oil Corporation, Through Its Chairman, Central Zone, Mumbai

3. General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Bihar State Office, Jai Prakash Bhawan, New Dak Bunglaw Road, P.S. Kotwali, District Patna

4. Senior Divisional Manager, Retail Sales, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Begusarai Division, P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery, P.S.- Barauni, DistrictBegusarai

5. State Of Bihar

6. District Magistrate, Samastipur P.S.+ Dt- Samastipur

7. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Samastipur, P.S.- + Dt.- Samastipur Respondent 1st Set

8. Baidyanath Sahni Son Of Sri Neti Lal Sahni Resident Of Village Gunai Bashi, P.S. Tajpur, District Samastipur

9. Indira Gandhi Ramji Rai College, Nikaspur, P.S. Tajpur District Samastipur Through Its Secretary Of The Managing Committee Namely Tarni Prasad Son Of Late Mishri Lal Rai, Resident Of Village Nikaspur, P.S. Tajpur District Samastipur Respondent 2nd Set ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Sr. Advocate Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2017 Heard the parties.

Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Indian Oil Corporation submits that the prayer has now been rendered infructuous as the representation of the petitioner has been dealt with and disposed of on 05.06.2014 which has been duly communicated to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10966 of 2013 (4) dt.03-10-2017 2/2 In view of such a decision by the Indian Oil Corporation, the prayer of the petitioner is no longer tenable and the writ application is fit to be dismissed.

After perusal of Annexure-A, it appears that the petitioner's representation/complaint was dealt with and has been disposed of.

It was open to the petitioner to challenge such disposal.

As such, the present application is dismissed as being devoid of any merit.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U