Md. Shamshad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30384 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2020 Thana- KISHUNPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Md. Shamshad Son Of Mohammad Shafik R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul 2.

Md. Barik @ Abdul Barik Son Of Mohammad Abdul R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul 3.

Md. Sajjad Alam Son Of Gul Mohammad Rain R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul 4.

Md. Nathunee Son Of Md. Mansur R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul 5.

Md. Taslim Son Of Md. Hiyati R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul 6.

Md. Sabbir Son Of Md. Nathunee R/O- Vill- Rajpur Ward No.2, P.S.- Kishanpur, Dist.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 325, 354(B), 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, it is a case of assault due to which informant, namely, Md. Bazir and others sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30384 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries, as alleged, in separate occurrence and no specific allegation of assault against these petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 210 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T