Ramsreth Prasad Srivastava v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11579 of 2012 ====================================================== Ramsresth Prasad Srivastava S/O Late Nageshwar Prasad R/O VillageBaarharwa Patchmohammad, Post Office- Karamwa, P.S.- Dhaka, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Water Resources Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna 3.
The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Valmiki Nagar, DistrictWest Champaran 4.
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department (Canal), Dhaka, District- East Champaran 5.
The Accountant General, Bihar, Virchand Patel Path, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, AC to AAG-6 For the Accountant General: Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 12-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to give the benefit of 1st and 2nd ACP to the petitioner after completion of 12 years and 24 years of service respectively.
Patna High Court CWJC No.11579 of 2012 dt.12-01-2024 2/2
3. As per averments made in the writ petition, the petitioner was retired from the service with effect from 31.01.2005 and he was getting revised pay scale of Rs. 4500-7000 with effect from 01.01.1996.
4. Learned counsel for the State submits that the petitioner was not passed the Departmental Accountant Examination so he could not get the benefit of 2nd time bond promotion as required vide Finance Department Govt. of Bihar letter no. 3/M-2-5-09-93-43-141 Finance (2) dated 21.06.1993 and there was not need to pass the Departmental Examination to get the 1st time bond promotion and as such the petitioner was granted the benefit of 1st time bond promotion and accordingly, all payment has been made to the petitioner.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, it appears that the gievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
6. The writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 16.01.2024 Transmission Date N.A.