← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./42706/2026disposed

Naresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-02Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42706 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2026 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Naresh Kumar S/o Sikindra Sahni Resident of Village - Khajauli Malik Tola, Ward No. 09, Kanhauli P.S. - Khajauli, Dist.- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sah For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 317(5) read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. The defect/s, as pointed out by the office, is hereby ignored.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 162 liters of liquor from three motorcycles.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42706 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/3 seized vehicles. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Pappu would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who was also apprehended from the spot.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

8. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42706 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 3/3 Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T