King Kislay Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16749 of 2015 =========================================================== King Kislay Kumar S/o- Sri Upendra Paswan, R/o Village- Manjhaul, P.S.- Cheriya Bariarpur, District- Begusarai, 26 .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, N.I.Ts. Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi null null

2. The Deputy Secretary (N.I.Ts.) Department of Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi

3. The Director, National Institute of Technology, Patna-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee, N.I.T., Ashok Raj Patha, Patna

4. National Institute of Technology, Patna, through its Registrar, Ashok Raj Path, Patna

5. The Chairman, Board of Governors of National Institute of Technology, Patna

6. The Registrar, National Institute of Technology, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.1&2: Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, C.G.C. For the Respondent Nos.3-6: Mr. Y.V.Giri, Senior Advocate Mr. S.K.Giri, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-11-2016 The issue raised by the petitioner has already been urged, considered and decided lock, stock and barrel in C.W.J.C. No. 13827 of 2015 in the case of Abhijeet Kumar Vs. The Union of India and Others. The judgment is dated 01.03.2016. Since the issue relates to the same advertisement and the arguments are also identical that the rules of the game is being sought to be changed midway, which this Court did not find so for the reasons indicated in the said order, the present writ application is also required to be

Patna High Court CWJC No.16749 of 2015 dt.28-11-2016 2/2 dismissed with an observation that the reasons assigned for rejection of the previous writ application also applies to the case of the present petitioner.

Writ is dismissed for the same set of reasons. Copy of the two orders are placed on record for future reference.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.11.2016 Transmission Date N/A