← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16136/2015disposed

Laxmina Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16136 of 2015 ====================================================== Laxmina Devi, wife of Dhanji Ram, resident of Village - Peyarepur, Post Office - Chanp, Under Gram Panchayat - Bagha Khoh, Police Station and Block - Akorhigola, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar.

2.

The Director, I.C.D.S. Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

The District Program Officer, I.C.D.S. Welfare, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.

The Bock Development Officer Akhorhigola, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.

The C.D.P.O., Akorhigola Block, District - Rohtas at Sasaram. 7.

Sarita Devi, wife of Shamlal Ram resident of Mohalla - Bolia, Ward No. 8, Post Office - Sasaram Town, District - Rothas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Md. Fazle Karim, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of respondent no.7.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that she has filed objection before the District Programme Officer, Rohtas about the selection of respondent no.7 and the same is still pending. In such view of the matter, let the District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram examine the objection of the petitioner and pass a reasoned order after hearing all the parties in accordance

Patna High Court CWJC No.16136 of 2015(2) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

This Court is not giving any opinion with regard to the merit of the case.

With this observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U