Pintu Kumar @ Pintu Chouhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30427 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-760 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
PINTU KUMAR @ PINTU CHOUHAN Son of Mohan Chauhan Resident of Village - Ramatand Mahuli, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada 2.
Sonelal Chouhan Son of Mohan Chauhan Resident of Village - Ramatand Mahuli, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ramchandra Sahni ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2019 Petitioners seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Nawada Nagar P.S. Case No. 760 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Prosecution case is that accused persons, including the petitioners came variously armed and petitioner No.2 assaulted by Khanti on the head of informant and petitioner No.1 has caught hold of him and there is also allegation of snatching Rs.500/- and gold chain worth Rs.15,000/-.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that as a matter of fact the occurrence took place with respect to tied of buffalo and injuries are simple in nature and moreover
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30427 of 2019(4) dt.21-08-2019 2/2 there is no allegation of assault against petitioner No.1. Heard learned APP also.
In view of above facts and circumstances, let petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Nagar P.S. Case No. 760 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T