Vikramkumar @ Chunnu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30173 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2021 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikramkumar @ Chunnu Son of Dilip Kumar Resident of Village - Hametpur, P.s.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The state of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 30-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case no. 153 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, when daughter of informant did not return till evening then informant tried to query about her and got knowledge that his daughter had been kidnapped by the petitioner with intention to marry her. It is further alleged that petitioner had abused and threatened the informant's father and committed rape with the victim. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30173 of 2022(3) dt.30-11-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has got no criminal antecedent. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to misconception. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. and stated that the petitioner kidnapped and committed rape with her. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the direct allegation of committing rape is against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shivani/- U T