← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16033/2015dismissed

Khushboo Kumari v. The Chief Manager, H R D, Punjab National Bank And ORS

2023-09-01Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16033 of 2015 ====================================================== Khushboo Kumari Daughter of Shri Mithilesh Singh, Resident of Village - Simri, Police Station - Rajnagar, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Chief Manager, H R D, Punjab National Bank, Circle Office, Darbhanga, G.M.Road, Darbhanga 2.

The Senior Manager, HRD, Punjab National Bank, Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga.

3.

The Postal Superintendent, Darbhanga, Division, Darbhanga. 4.

The Assistant Postal Superintendent, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 5.

The Union of India, through Post Master General, C.P.O. Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the UOI :

Mr. S.B.Singh, Adv.

For the PNB :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ram Ganesh, Adv.

Mr. Vibhuti Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents to show-cause as to why interview letter was not issued and sent to the petitioner to participate in the interview scheduled to be held on 16.03.2015.

(ii) For a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to issue fresh interview letter to the petitioner fixing date and time schedule for the same so that she may face interview and to get a job for her livelihood. (iii) For a direction to the respondent Nos.1 and 2 to

Patna High Court CWJC No.16033 of 2015(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 appoint the petitioner on the post of Peon in their Bank since they have failed to send the interview letter to the petitioner as aforesaid."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U