Fulendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29237 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-58 Year-2025 Thana- BHANAS District- Rohtas ====================================================== Fulendra Ram S/o Late Lallu Ram R/o Village - Basdiha, PS - Bhanas, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nagendra Upadhyay, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Jainandra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State as also learned counsel for the informant. Perused the case diary.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bhanas P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109 & 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that due to a dispute over dumping soil in the informant's field, the petitioner and a co-accused allegedly assaulted the informant's 14-year-old son with bricks while he was playing at a school on 20.12.2025, causing serious head injuries and grievous injury to his right eye.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29237 of 2026(4) dt.22-07-2026 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28.01.2026. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent, as per disclosure made in paragraph No. 3 of the bail application.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner allegedly assaulted the son of the informant and injury is found to be grievous in nature. Charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29237 of 2026(4) dt.22-07-2026 3/3 in connection with Bhanas P.S. Case No. 58 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

(I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T