Noorshabba @ Navshaba Praveen v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37802 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-717 Year-2023 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== Noorshabba @ Navshaba Praveen D/O Sirajuddin R/O Mohalla- Gandhi Nagar, Ward No. 27, Gali No. 12, Police Station- Dehri (TOWN), Distt.- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307, 452/34 of the IPC in connection with Dehri (Town) P.S. Case No.717 of 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a women and the informant alleges that on 06.09.2023 while he was sleeping in his rented house, when he heard a knock on the door, thereafter, he opened the door when Raja and petitioner entered his room and started assaulting indiscriminately by knife causing injury. It is also alleged that informant was in love with the petitioner earlier, but younger sister of the petitioner used to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37802 of 2024(3) dt.03-10-2024 2/2 threatened the informant of getting him implicated in a false rape case.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that petitioner along with Raja are alleged to have assaulted him by knife, as such the allegation of assault is not specific, on which the learned APP, Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad submits that from perusal of the case diary, it would manifest that informant has received seven injuries on vital part of the body and the injuries are stab wound.
5. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner, accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T