Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30304 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Samastipur ====================================================== Nitish Kumar @ Nitish Kumar Singh Son of Kamakhiya Narayan Singh Village - Hemanpur, Ward no. 1, Ps- Mohiuddin Nagar, Dist- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar bihar 2.
Gunja Kumari Daughter of Ashok Kumar Singh village- Rampur Baghel, Ps- Sahdei, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Mahila P.S. Case No. 87 of 2023 registered under Sections-498(A), 341, 323, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. The informant is wife of the petitioner. She made allegation that for non-fulfillment of demand of a Bullet Motorcycle, the petitioner tortured and ousted her from matrimonial house.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30304 of 2025(4) dt.07-10-2025 2/2 case. He is a person of clean antecedent. He is ready to keep the victim with full dignity and honour but the victim is not ready to reside with him.
5. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for exploring the possibility of amicable resolution of the dispute but the mediation could not be successful.
6. Learned counsel for the informant submits that though the petitioner has three criminal antecedents but in paragraph-3 of the bail petition, he has concealed this fact. He has also submitted that he used to assault the informant/victim.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is not entitled for privilege of anticipatory bail and accordingly, the same is rejected.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T