Sharda Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7207 of 2026 ====================================================== Sharda Devi, Wife of Bhikhar Hajara @ Bhikhar Paswan, Resident of Village - Inarwa Phulwar, P.S. - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Land and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The District Magistrate - Cum - Collector, District - East Champaran, Motihari.

3.

The Circle Officer, Bankatwa Circle District East Champaran. 4.

The Officer in Charge SC/ST PS Motihari, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

Mohan Sah Son of -Khedu Sah, resident of Village- Inarwa Phulwar, Police Station - Lkhaura, District - East Champaran. 6.

Pramod Sah Son of Mohan Sah resident of Village- Inarwa Phulwar, Police Station - Lkhaura, District - East Champaran. 7.

Madan Sah Son of Late Bainajee Sah resident of Village- Inarwa Phulwar, Police Station - Lkhaura, District - East Champaran. 8.

Lalan Sah Son of Late Bainajee Sah resident of Village- Inarwa Phulwar, Police Station - Lkhaura, District - East Champaran. 9.

Uma Sah Son of Late Sahdeo Sah resident of Village- Inarwa Phulwar, Police Station - Lakhaura, District - East Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-06-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present application is that the private respondent Nos. 5 to 9 have been disturbing the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land in question. The contention of the petitioner is that the private respondents have been interfering with the peaceful possession, and they are even

Patna High Court CWJC No.7207 of 2026(2) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 trying to enter the lands of the petitioner on one pretext or the other only because the land of the petitioner does not have a boundary wall.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner limits his submissions to the extent that the lands of the petitioner may be measured and demarcated by the authorities in order to settle any differences with the private respondents.

4. Learned AC to AAG-9 does not dispute such submissions and in fact, submits that if the petitioner files a measurement case, the same will be carried out by the authority.

5. Considering the aforesaid submissions, the present writ application is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Authority/Circle Officer, Bankatwa Circle, East Champaran, with an application for measurement and demarcation of the land as per the documents of title available with him.

6. The present application stands disposed off with the aforesaid liberty.

(Sourendra Pandey, J) manoj/- U