← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14182/2016disposed

Niyamtullah Shah @ Nemtullah Shah v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-29Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14182 of 2016 ====================================================== Niyamtullah Shah @ Nemtullah Shah son of late Bismillah Shah Resident of Village-Kotasa, P.O. and P.S.-Durgawati District-Kaimur Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors.

2.

The Additional Collector, Kaimur 3.

The Deputy Collector, Land and Reforms, Mohania, Kaimur 4.

The Circle Officer, Durgawati Kaimur 5.

The Bihar Land Tribunal, Patna through its Chairman 6.

Sarafraj Ahmad Son of Late Md. Idrish Shah 7.

Mumtaz Shah Son of Late Idrish Shah 8.

Imtiyaz Shah son of Late Idrish Shah 9.

Sartaz Shah Son of Late Idrish Shah 10.

Irshad Shah Son of Late Md. Idrish Shah 11.

Riyaz Shah Son of Late Md. Idrish Shah All Resident of village-Kotasa, P.O. and P.S. Durgawati, District-Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 29-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for grant of the following relief(s):- "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of order dated 03.03.2016 passed by Hon'ble Bihar Land Tribunal (hereinafter referred as "Tribunal") in BLT case No. 75 of 2015 whereby the learned Tribunal has

Patna High Court CWJC No.14182 of 2016(4) dt.29-07-2025 2/2 dismissed the case of petitioner by affirming the order dated 12.03.2010 passed by Learned Additional Collector, Kaimur in Mutation Revision No. 63 of 2005-06/61 of 2008-09.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of mandamus directing the private respondents to not to interfere in the peaceful possession of the petitioner over the land in question.

(iii) For grant of any relief(s) the petitioner would be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be contesting the Title Suit No. 541 of 2012 pending before the competent Civil Court so that the matter is finally taken to its logical conclusion.

4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ankit Kumar/- U