Amrendra Chaudhary @ Pinku Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49393 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -433 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWALI District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. AMRENDRA CHAUDHARY @ PINKU KUMAR, S/o Sursh Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Raisar, P.S.- Kotwali (Basudeopur O.P.), District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 433 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 364/34, 384, 386, 387, 201 and 120 (B) of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act. As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the victim girl and the complainant, petitioner and informant, all are own brothers.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is delay of four years of lodging the F.I.R. and even the police after investigation found that the case is not true against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49393 of 2018 (2) dt.28-08-2018 2/2 antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 433 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T