Seema Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63562 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2017 Thana -KOTWA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Seema Devi, w/o Birendra Yadav, R/o Village- Bhirkhiya, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Pushpa Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Kotwa P.S. Case No. 154 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is married Nanad of the deceased. The husband is already in custody.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kotwa P.S. Case No. 154 of 2017, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63562 of 2017 (3) dt.13-02-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Motihari, Distt. East Champaran at Motihari, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T