Raju Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29274 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Raju Kumar S/o Lakhindra Yadav @ Lakhendra Yadav R/o Vill.- Jagiraha Bhutha Tola, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Turkauliya, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5), 338, 336(3), 336(4), 340(1), 340(2) of the BNSS.

3. The case of the prosecution is that one stolen bike was recovered from the possession of this petitioner. It is alleged that the bike which was being driven by the petitioner, was intercepted, and when he was asked regarding the documents of the bike, he could not furnish any document.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29274 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 case. He also submits that nothing has been recovery from the possession of the petitioner. It has also been submitted that there is no complaint regarding theft of bike. Counsel also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire that the signature of this petitioner is only on the last page. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.02.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 52 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T