Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32738/2024bail granted

Md Moharram @ Md Moharram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-20Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32738 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2023 Thana- BAISI District- Purnia ====================================================== Md Moharram @ Md Moharram Son of Late Hasib RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - MINAPUR, POLICE STATION - BAISI,DISTRICT - PURNIA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Najeeb Ahmad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for an offence punishable under Sections 365/34, 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to the prosecution case, the informant suspects that the petitioner along with other co-accused persons have murdered the husband of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case and similarly situated co-accused has been granted bail by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 38851 of 2023, 41967 of 2023 61293 of 2023 and 27495 of 2024, petitioner has got

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32738 of 2024(2) dt.20-05-2024 2/2 clean antecedent as stated in para-3 of the petition and he is in custody since 31.01.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Purnea in connection with Baisi P.S Case No. 98 of 2023.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a period of 15 (fifteen days) from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T