Raj Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45860 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Raj Kumari Devi W/o Awadhesh Sah, R/o Vill.- Dumari, P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bela Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S. Case No. 279/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B) and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. Husband of the deceased is already in custody. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Muzaffarpur Sadar P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45860 of 2018 (2) dt.16-08-2018 2/2 Case No. 279/2018, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T