Randhir Kumar @ Ranadhir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2369 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-304 Year-2017 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Randhir Kumar @ Ranadhir Kumar Son of Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh Resident of Mohalla- Jain Mandir Gali, Police Station- Alamganj, DistrictPatna ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.
Mr. Rudal Singh, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2018 Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel, assisted by Sri Raghunandan Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri Ram Sevak Choudhary, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as Sri Rudal Singh, learned counsel, who has voluntarily appeared on behalf of the informant. The petitioner, husband of the deceased, apprehending his arrest in Alamganj P.S. Case No.304 of 2017 registered for the offence under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code, has prayed for grant of bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender. Learned counsel for the petitioner, by way of referring to the F.I.R. , submits that from the contents of the F.I.R. it is evident that it was not a case of dowry death and, as such, a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2369 of 2018(5) dt.04-04-2018 2/2 prayer has been made to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender.
However, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the informant submit that from the F.I.R. it is evident that specific case is made out against F.I.R. named accused. It has not been disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner that death of the deceased has occurred in the house of the petitioner.
Besides hearing learned counsel for the parties, I have also perused the material on record including the case diary and after going through the same, I do not find any ground to pass favourable order.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner stands dismissed.
(Rakesh Kumar, J) nawalkrs/- U T