Ranjan Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.47125 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -622 Year- 2017 Thana -MANER District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Ranjan Kumar, S/o Wakil Ray,
2. Satyendra Ray, S/o Late Balam Ray, Both are R/o Village- Jeorakhan Tola Darveshpur, P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Maner P.S.Case No.622 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 152, 188, 341, 323, 307, 332, 333, 337, 338, 427, 441, 353, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Damage to Public Property Act. Petitioners are said to be member of the mob who were protesting against the government and there is also allegation of brick-batting by the mob.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that though they are named in the FIR but no specific allegation has been attributed against them.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.47125 of 2018 (2) dt.14-08-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., Danapur, Patna in connection with Maner P.S.Case No.622 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T