← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1190/2015withdrawn

Suresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-10Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1190 of 2015 ====================================================== Suresh Kumar, Son of Late Kamleshwari Prasad, Resident of Village - Bharbari, Police Station - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Zone, Darbhanga.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Range, Darbhanga.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga.

6. The City Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga.

7. The Station House Office, Hayaghat Police Station, District - Darbhanga.

8. Archana Kumari, Wife of Suresh Kumar, Resident of Village - Bharbari, Police Station - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga.

9. Rajendra Yadav, Son of late Sajjan Yadav, Resident of Dhovupur Vansara, Police Station - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga.

10. Wife of Rajendra Yadav name not known, Resident of Dhovupur Vansara, Police Station - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga.

11. Yogendra Yadav

12. Mahendra Yadav Both sons of late Sajjan Yadav, Resident of Dhovupur Vansara, Police Station - Hayaghat, District - Darbhanga.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Pandey S. Sahay, SC-31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 10-03-2016 In view of stand of the State that pursuant to the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1190 of 2015 (2) dt.10-03-2016 2 / 2 direction given by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, the police have already instituted Hayaghat P.S. Case No. 80 of 2015 under Sections 494, 420, 467, 468, 407, 408, 409, 120-B, 366 and 496 of the Indian Penal Code, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present application, as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.

Leave is granted.

The application is disposed of as withdrawn.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T