Ramswarath Singh @ Adauri Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30882 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2023 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Ramswarath Singh @ Adauri Singh Son Of Late Chhito Singh Resident Of Viallgae- Khutha Dih (WEST) , Ps- Barahiya, Distt- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 25 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 365 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that he abducted the son of the informant and the informant believed that his son might be disappeared somewhere by the petitioner. It is further alleged that during investigation, dead body of the informant's son recovered near the bridge.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this present case. It is further submitted from para-14 of this petition that postmortem report did not support the prosecution version. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30882 of 2023(3) dt.31-07-2023 2/2 also submitted that he has no connection with the alleged occurrence. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 31.01.2023.

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that petitioner is named in FIR and during investigation, the petitioner confessed his guilt and at his instance, the dead body of the informant's son was recovered which is mentioned in para-21 of the case diary. It is also submitted that witnesses supported the prosecution case. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T