Patna High CourtMJC/705/2015disposed

Vijay Shankar Pathak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-10-16Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.705 of 2015 IN Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 106 of 2012 =========================================================== Vijay Shankar Pathak, S/o Late Pt. Paras Nath Pathak, Resident of Village Bharkhar, P.O. Raghunathpur, P.S. Brachmpur, District Buxar. At present R/o A/64, Police Colony, P.O. Anishabad, P.S. Gardanibagh. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna, Sri Ashok Kumar Sinha.

2. Sri Abhayanand, the Director General cum Inspector General of Police.

3. Mr. R.D. Ram, Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Dharmnath Choudhary, the Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Ajay Kumar Yadav, the District Magistrate, Buxar.

6. Mr. Upendra Kumar Sinha, the Superintendent of Police, Buxar.

7. Binod Mishra, Contractor of BHARKHAR RAHTHUAN ROAD S/o Kamla Mishra R/o Village & P.S. Simri, District Buxar, Prime Minister Gramin Sarak Yojna, P.S. Bharampur, District Buxar, through Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Buxar.

.... .... Opp. Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opp. Parties : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-10-2015 In compliance of the order of the High Court Collector, Buxar is present and states that in compliance of the order passed by his predecessor in office dated 04.05.2012 possession of the petitioner has been restored over plot nos. 456, 681, 990 and the same has also been filled with soil but the soil filling work has not been done up to road level so as to ensure that the rain water from the road flows into the adjoining plots. Any report of the Executive Engineer

Patna High Court MJC No.705 of 2015 dt.16-10-2015 2/2 or Amin or any other functionary submitted contrary to the order dated 04.05.2012 should be withdrawn forthwith as petitioner must have the possession of the three plots in the light of the order dated 04.05.2012.

With the observation aforesaid, the contempt petition is disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J) Rajesh/- U