Sunil Dutt Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44358 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.C.ase No. -52 Year- 2018 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Sunil Dutt Pandey S/o Late Daya Shankar Pandey , R/o Vill.- Charpokhari, P.S.- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur (Ara). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramchandra Singh, Advocate Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 52/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner assaulted the informant with rod causing injury on his head. The doctor has opined about the injury of the informant to be simple in nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44358 of 2018 (2) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 52/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Ara, Bhojpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) Rakhi U T