Indu Devi @ Manju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30168 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2020 Thana- PUNPUN District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Indu Devi @ Manju Devi Wife Of Madan Das Resident Of Village - Nadpura, P.S.- Punpun, District - Patna.

2.

Kiran Devi Wife Of Sadan Das Resident Of Village - Nadpura, P.S.- Punpun, District - Patna.

3.

Guriya Devi @ Sharda Devi Wife Of Madan Das Resident Of Village - Nadpura, P.S.- Punpun, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nilesh Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 30-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the father of the informant

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that it is firstly informed

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30168 of 2022(6) dt.30-08-2023 2/2 that the victim succumbed to his injuries during treatment and subsequently Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has also been added in the present case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners are female. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Punpun P.S. Case No.63 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T